It is called this way to sociométrico event that occurs when it systematically ignores a number of members of a group that is working.

En Psicodrama (as well as any other dramatic procedure) Different methodologies are distinguished elements:

I) Instruments (Ver), II) stages (Ver), III) contexts (Ver), IV) levels (Ver), V) techniques (Ver), significance) tactics (Ver).

The differentiate clearly allows cleaning methodologies and operational accuracy.

It is called thus to the union or merger with other emotional beings and objects (They considered animated).

The German term originally was adopted by Herder and Novalis, but it was released by Theodore Lipps, who used to clarify the nature of aesthetic experience. According to Lipps this experience, enabling the knowledge of other beings, It would be given through an act of imitation and projection. These resonant catchments, phenomena with playback, Following the criteria would Lipps, due to imitation of bodily manifestations of others. such imitations, He said, reproduce in ourselves the emotions contained in these demonstrations. Adopt the attitude of the other postural, It puts us in the emotional state of the person to whom these manifestations belong.

The concept was then abandoned, for being in opposition to theoretical schemes and further research, such as those of Scheler, for whom the phenomena of understanding or sympathy, They had nothing to do with empathy or emotional fusion.

Many other lines in the phenomenological schools followed the same criterion of Max Scheler. However current developments in Philosophical Anthropology (such as Gabriel Marcel, R. Kush, C. Cullen and G. Rebok) as well as new findings made in the investigations into deep telic phenomenology to work specifically in the primary levels of interconnectedness (Foultes, Usandivaras, Spanish, Menegazzo, Tomasini, etc.) reopen the discussion on this item.

This is one of the conceptual foundations of philosophical thought of Moreno and one of the principles of its anthropological vision. Therefore it is an angular concept for building your psychotherapeutic model.

“In the beginning was the Word” says the Gospel of John.

“In the beginning was the Act” Faust says in the myth of Goethe, that was the paradigm of romanticism.

“At first was the Meeting” Moreno insists.

Permeated by the thought of vitalistas underlying philosophical theories and the work of Kierkegaard and Buber and others, Moreno meeting raised, además, as one of the human potential in relationship with himself, other in the world and transcendence.

For such Meeting, extremely difficult but not impossible, can happen, so that it can flourish true integration of man with other men, and humanity with himself, must be overcome stereotypes technical, scientific and cultural, which will result, según Moreno, the deployment of freedom, spontaneity and creativity.

Meeting the word and concept are synonymous for Tele Moreno (Ver tele). Not only attraction or friendly relations, but also hostile and shock (shock to the meeting) They are essential to achieve a genuine encounter.

The meeting according Moreno, You can never be prepared or assembled in advance, or planned, or examined or scrutinized, it can only happen in the aegis of the moment.

Dalmiro Bustos says there univocal words that called symmetrical relations. Por ejemplo, love, lovers, etc. Univocal name is on the link, when it designated roles horizontal operation, symmetrical.

Asymmetrical relationships lack, meanwhile, a unique name. There is talk of padrehijo relations, profesoralumno, employer employee, o sea, each of the parties that relates receives a name, as if this link lacked a specific name.

The symmetry allows a qualitatively different encounter: the responsibility is the same. The asymmetry carries a responsibility not equal, but proportional to the role.

The therapeutic relationship is asymmetrical and uneven for the following reasons:

1 The patient is one who seeks professional services; it is the patient who pays the fees fixed by the therapist; each role standards are not the same. The fundamental difference is that professional secrecy only involves the therapist. In that sense we must be careful with what you share with the patient in the therapeutic sharing, since he is not involved in this requirement of secrecy.

Find a horizontality in the therapeutic relationship is to ignore the deeply asymmetrical and uneven nature of this link, and can generate confusing and anarchic rules.

This does not mean it is not possible asymmetric meeting, which has different contractual rules of a symmetric meeting and only if these rules except they be respected, the meeting will become impossible.

If each member of a relationship know their rights and duties and respect, growth possible. If not, the relationship is the parent of mixed messages, es decir, Pathogenic itself.

Leave a Reply