(See Grouping roles)
Moreno called thus to common conscious states that can be achieved from certain psychodramatic group interactions.
It is one of the essential characteristics of a group. She denotes its dynamics. The degree of cohesion of a given group is related to certain characteristics of all variables taken particular group, por ejemplo: group structure, the group's objectives, the difficulties encountered in achieving its goals, etc. Group cohesion is something dynamic that is modified over time as the group process is modified. Changes to group cohesion are given essentially a function of the mesh network link or group sociométrica. Scientifically group cohesion can be read from the study of sociometric configurations (see conf. sociométricas) They obtained in a sociogram. These studies clearly manifest tele structure of a group and its constant changes, and its pathology. Since sociometry, group cohesion greater the greater the number of mutual elections. For the theory of the higher spectrum of roles is the same and more spontaneous and creatively played, greater group cohesion.
Any link to be established will exist alongside a conscious link apparent to both members of the same, a nexus of unconscious unconscious created through shared life experiences that Moreno called coinconscientes. The scheduled and systematic work in psychodrama promoted in all and each of the group members, Individual elaborative processes (See elaboratorios processes). However not all phenomena are evident from these group work can be understood fully from the changes that occur at the level of the individual unconscious. Certain phenomena coemisión, de copercepción, of cointuición and cosentir or sympathy, (to put it in terms schelerianos) and its modifications are not fully exhausted by this way of explanation. They seem to indicate the correlative of a coinconsciente. These phenomena and some others seem to indicate the need for a deeper study of the dark intimacies of links and their states of unconsciousness common, both in dyadic as in triadic or multídico. What is evident is that some phenomena seem to arise only from the individual psyche but simultaneously in several other, when these are linked together by the bond. Moreno who gave the human link, we could say the category of an entity, He called these states: coinconscientes. It may also be defined, as the confluence in the deep level of communication telic group of reenactment of traumatic scenes (see traumatic scenes) the relational poles members, of the mythical scenes of the poles of links, whose coincidence or whose lace is the updating or warming of one or more of the three basic techniques (or whether cosmic, death or look the other) at the level of fear or panic.
In a first instance of its way of working, Moreno called thus to the third stage of the psychodrama session. He used synonymously words “comments” Y “Analysis”. In a second instance, from joint work with Zerka Moreno, the third stage of psychodrama was structured in two days, clearly defined. The first was called “share” (sharing) (see share) and the second kept the name of commentary or analysis itself. The latter is the time of the accusations and interpretations. In psychodrama we prefer to operate so that the insight is done in the dramatic work during the restructuring of the troubled nuclear scene (See troubled nuclear scene). The time of analysis is working differently depending on the school and epistemological reference in the psychodrama phenomenon frame. The third stage of psychodrama at the time to share, does double duty: 1) for group members; the ability to verbalize and to share the understanding of those specific aspects that have been mobilized during the dramatization, involving personal history, openings Psychodramatic areas of future work, enrichment of the spectrum of roles and understanding of complementary roles; 2) for the protagonist; the discovery that its drama, he has laid bare before others, He has been shared and co-starring his bandmates. That which distinguished and defined as protagonist, reinstates it at this stage the group, a different way of allowing strengthen its links with research partners. The timing of further analysis mainly reinforces understanding of what happened in the intellectual or symbolic side and on the side of “darse cuenta, axiológico”. In short, the stage called “commentary” You can consist of three substages: 1) Time to share (see share). 2) The time to comment (Properly said) and when you are working on educational or training. 3) Teóricotécnica time for the elaboration of what happened in the session. ”