In the writings of Moreno we can find descriptions that the author makes his way to conceive the human evolutionary process and how this anthropological vision is integrated into a more abrogative and holistic thinking. As man before birth blanket and is nestled in the bond of the mother's womb, from birth must cross to complete the process of establishing its own unique identity different universes. Moreno called identity matrix, family and social matrix matrix (View respectively) these other universes that await every man. But in no way should we think that Moreno understood this series of universes only as milestones to be eslabonando escuderilmente from conception but as universes with mutual relationships to form a whole will provide the rich complementary network that will allow the insertion of the individual in the world through constant linking and meeting. Identity matrices, family and social life does not happen in time but will complete and continuously part of the whole individual. If we analyze thoroughly the writings of Moreno will note that his conception of the act of birth, as a creative act actively sought by the child and which actively prepared for nine months, It is the archetypal model for their system of thought. Death is seen by the creator of psychodrama with the sense of a revival, a novel transformation, not a final act but a new leap to another array, something like the last vital biological act in which lead is to be to integrate again in this cosmic matrix in which “At that time”, both the beginning and the end of time, Moreno believes has been, It is occurring and will Encounter. Es más, in every human act, in every link and every moment coexist and coimplican all matrices; cosmic biological maternal genetic identity the family and social powerfully interlinked. The above is roughly the worldview Moreniana. We can feel attracted to it, we can reject it or you can leave us indifferent, but thus the father of psychodrama articulated the sense of all his work and all concerned to understand and promote what he called the hunger for human transformation (Ver hambre de transformación). From this worldview, Moreno cohesively organized his own life and his own death. In this world view, Moreno places the meeting at the beginning and end of time. The development of an individual human being is for him nothing but an infinitesimal part of a major change in course. All individual forms of this evolution will from each conception that gives them unique origin by the mother's womb, the identity matrix and the social matrix. These matrices will be offered as links to give you the possibility of existential self individualization. But precisely through the act of death may be operated reimbursement of each of these individual beings to cosmic whole great tote ongoing project. At the beginning and end, is the Meeting, Moreno says. The more you have achieved every being in the process of individuality, deeper will be for him totalizator meeting. Psychodrama is thought by Moreno as a way of knowledge and improvement. Also proposed in this respect, with all coherence, from an essentially religious worldview that has ruled him throughout his life and throughout his work trasunta.
It is the availability of human beings to the creative act, considering as such any act that produces an integrative transformation, within the meaning of growth and maturation, in the person performing as well as the environment that surrounds. The theme of creativity is central to the theory of psychodrama. From his earliest works closely Moreno linked the concept of freedom (Ver) and spontaneity (Ver), with creativity. The considered functions of the same process, the creation of the Great underway. Both beauty, as truth and harmony can be seen as aspects of this universal archetype towards which, or moves away, the creative process. For this beauty, truth and harmony are some of the units of this universal multiplicity. If we understand art as a process, we can consider a constant search of that universal values such part. Ahora bien, all creativity, whatever the field in which it unfolds, will look with a particular approach to reality, certain aspects of these values to illuminate and highlight them. Depending on the field that will be deployed, will change the mode of operation of creativity. It will be different operating mode of scientific creativity, or linguistic creativity, if compared with how to approach the very reality of artistic creativity. Science and language processes affect abstraction of reality, For this, both scientific concept as the word, will result always, as products of such processes, abbreviations reality. Artistic creativity instead has an intensified search effects of this reality. Art is a constant task of concreteness and concretions are those that are shaping the artistic production. The psychodrama creativity turn, It combines and synthesizes these two modes described earlier approach of reality, it therefore operates on effects of intensification and through processes of abstraction. Producing psychodramatic creativity tends specifically to capture in the individual new ways of being, playing roles and link. creativity is, for the father of psychodrama, the constant possibility that allows man to the production of cultural treasures (see cultural preserves) while gives every human being a continuous enrichment of himself and his relations. The man there comes the world, según Moreno, with a wealth of creativity and spontaneity that enables you to face your first fundamental change, the birth, from which he will live in a constant balance between itself, their needs, deseos, etc. and the surrounding world. The ongoing exercise their creativity (ie its ability to modify or modified) maintain this balance. In a skit called creativity to the most developed form of spontaneity in performing a role and in this respect it is considered a quality of dramatic action. (see spontaneity). In different fields of science man from Moreno, It is still reflecting on the theme creativity, and while many contributions made from all these fields, we have worked psychodramatists from different lines, They deserve to be taken into account. In addition to the authors who signed this dictionary, Fidel Maccio in our midst has specialized in this vein, another author, C. Martinez Bouquet in his Theory of the scene with respect to creativity proposes to distinguish three different meanings, (at least three) namely: a) The condition that an artist makes it to produce masterpieces, or other kinds of great products who are not artists. b) The condition of an artist, or artist, which enables him to produce a work, object, etc., personal and genuine. c) The expressive power of an individual. Later this author, which we transcribed verbatim, argues that “the creation of a work goes through two moments, which can be simultaneous: the production… from the author's life a “latent melody” Y… the appearance of the “melody” in the manifest as an art form or other production “discursive”: the translation of the work”. Martinez says in the same job Bouquet: “Creativity is the ability to originate forms… from elevated areas be… formal levels closer to the manifest.
It is necessary to distinguish the concept of crisis in the concept of conflict. Crisis, in the original Greek sense, it means: crossroads at which you need to choose (make a decision, ineludiblemente. Because even when you think not take any, you are choosing not to choose). Every crisis always involves, for man, at least one unit opposite offered, and sometimes, they may even be more than one opposition; but they always take some force to match this or that. What is not always given, in the crisis, is the conflict. For a crisis, becomes or is transformed into conflict is necessary that one of the poles of the opposition further hostilities will be relative to each other. In your choice, between this or that, man he shows his strength and fragility (an example of unity of opposites) and so many times, in their fragility, You find precisely his real victory. In a discussion (por ejemplo), knowing losing to a persuasive argument the other, there will be accepted the fragility of its previous opinion, but at the same time you win, both learning and modesty. Here the example of a crisis. And, en cambio, the discussion a dialogue of the deaf turns and losing becomes imbecile thing, and winning in a matter of obstinacy, evade or in cowardice, behold, the unity of opposites has already become conflict. Link to a crisis becomes conflict, each pole and each role should turn against each other and that always means being against hostile devaluation of the one relative to the other and vice versa (See dramatic conflict and latent conflict nodal).
It is the reason (or common mobile) It is carrying members of a group in the same spontaneous impulse, towards a particular purpose. (For example search for a roof, food, of love, the need for a companion, etc.). For a sociometric research is valid, You should join sociometric test questions, the critery. The question Who do you prefer. in this group?, sociométrica no lack validity if the criterion. The questions, Who would you prefer. of this group?: to work, for study, to walk, etc. are different criteria that will shoot different sociometric structures, at the discretion of the group itself. The criterion should be also truly linked to the objective of the search. For example research on preferences that students have a degree in respect of their peers it is valid if the group is convinced that once discovered the sociometric matrix group, It is going to make it coincide with the external organization. For example if you are convinced that, once discovered preferences regarding fellow bank, It will change the distribution of students in the classroom agree with them. The criterion should have two basic objectives: one diagnosis and other structural modification; both they know fulfilled.