The concept of scapegoat, It has its origin in the history of Greek tragedy. “Tragedy” originally it meant “the cry of the goat”. They were singing the litanies that to commemorate the heroic deeds of DIONISOS and favorite animal (whereby it symbolized) during the festivities Vintage (the Dionisíacas). In primitive holidays, the animal was chased by the whole procession of men, fauna y bacantes. When it reached, He was torn to devour, because that way it is shared and communed with vitality, strength and divinity of God. this rite, in the aftermath, It was transformed into mere chronicle of heroic deeds, more or less, divine and profane that, Finally, It led to stage performance. The concept of protagonist in Greek tragedy is closely linked to the concept of scapegoat (one who dies, suffers and acts “como si” It was done in the origins). In group psychotherapy, en cambio, these two concepts (the protagonist and the scapegoat), although they share the same root, They differ greatly. It is called a star (Ver) the one who, circumstantially, It offers its dramatic research (in the group, with the group, and for the group) in order to process all elaborative. Se denomina, en cambio, scapegoat to shift integral deposited in alternative and pathologically, at certain times of group process, shades, massive projections, loads negative transfers (partial or total), for what, by these interplays, act and / or suffer that which the group denies or represses and therefore can not understand, take and redistribute. All chivaje emergence of conflicting refers to acute moments of great group compulsiveness, with trends desintegrativas. Each choice of a protagonist, en cambio, patentiza the possibility of a real group match; a significant meeting, around someone who can represent, free, spontaneous, creative and severally, All the Little throbbing psychodrama community, it is narrowing and that part integrativamente.