It is item or person exercising the role faces or opposes the goal of the protagonist, in a particular action. It is playing the complementary role conflict opponent facing the protagonist in the dramatic action.
It is the discipline that displays the man from the look in his vincularidades; this is from their ability and difficulty of relatedness. LINKING anthropology articulates integrativamente (from epistemological concepts related), The PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY (G. Marcel, N. Abbagnano, E. Paci, P. Prini, L. Binswanger, P. Ricoeur, R. Kush, C. Cullen, P. Geltman, G. Rebok, H. Mandrioni, etc.), bioanthropology and neoevolutionism (Teilhard de Chardin, E. Morin, F. Monod, F. Jacob, etc.), modern developments of the psychoanalytic theory of object relations (M. Klein, P. Riviere, D.W. Winnicott, J. Boulby, S.H. Foulkes), DEEP PSYCHOLOGY ARCHETYPES and current DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ANCESTRAL (C.G. Jung, V. Rubino, C. Menegazzo, H. Spanish, M.A. Tomasini, R. Usandivaras) and the theory of Telico DEEP Moreno and his followers. This integrated theories body provides a model to look deemphasize, so heated up today for our culture, in the individual pole of the vincularidades.
Thus it called the Lgar and when an action is happening, whether it is a simple postural expression, a gestural act or a verbal statement. Psychodrama is necessary to permanently differentiate, as clearly as possible, el “aquí y ahora” group “dramatic”.
It is the place and the time of dramatization. For the empire and the dramatic representation own laws everything that happens in the psychodrama scenario is developing in a very special here and now, time and space that are unique dramatization. Whatever the time a protagonist explore the dramatic context, both when it is a scene that he located in its last or remote mediate biographical, as when facing a prospective scene in any possible future, You will be living it, “como si”, in the here and now imaginary dramatic representation.